Non-Farm Employment and Rural Household’s consumption expenditures in Neyshabour county: Propensity Score Matching Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

2 Ferdowsi university of Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction
Rural non-farm sector(RNFS) comprises all economic activities –such as manufacturing, transport, commerce, banking, service and so on) in rural areas expect cropping, agriculture, livestock, husbandry, hunting, fishing, and forestry. So, RNFE means employment of rural household members in the nonfarm sector, and RNFI is the income thereby generated. Various studies have shown that nonfarm activities play an important role in reducing rural poverty, increasing incomes and improving rural household’s well-being. The present study tries to investigate the effect of non-farm employment on rural household’s consumption expenditures in Neyshabour county.
 
Materials and Methods
The data is gathered through a questionnaire survey carried out on 380 rural households from four districts (Zabarkhan, Markazi, Sarvelayat and Mianjolgeh) in the Neyshabour county. The survey is conducted between September 2017 to February 2018. The household was chosen through a multi-stage stratified random sampling.
The propensity score matching approach is used to examine the impact of participation in non-farm activities on householdconsumption expenditures. The method compares the consumption expenditures of non-farm households with their counterfactual group that did not diversify into such activities, depending only on  farm activities. The propensity score is defined P(Xi) as the conditional probability of receiving a treatment (employment in nonfarm activities) given pre-treatment characteristics:





(1)

 




Where Xi denotes a vector of pre-treatment characteristics of household i such as household head characteristics, agricultural characteristics and household characteristics ; b(xi) is the logistic conditional function and F(b(xi)) represents logistic cumulative distribution frequency.
In propensity score matching analysis, the average treatment effect on the treated (ATET) is important. It is computed by matching farm and non-farm households that are closest in terms of their propensity scores and calculated as follows.





(2)


ATET (X) = E(Y1i | Ti = 1) - E (Y0i | Ti = 1)





Where, E(Y1i | Ti =1) represents the expected consumption expenditures outcome of households engaged in non-farm activities and E(Y0i | Ti=1) denotes the counterfactual  consumption expenditures of households without these activities. The counterfactual estimates represent what the consumption expenditures outcome of  households engaged in non-farm activities would be if they have not engaged in non-farm activities.
 
Results and Discussion
Survey of 380 households showed that 267 households were engaged in non-farm employment and 113 households had only agricultural activity. The results showed that household's characteristics such as the age of household head, household education, farmland size, livestock ownership, amount of credits and agricultural assets (water value and agricultural machinery) and household asset for the households engaged in non-farm activities and they have not engaged this activities were significantly different but after matching propensity scores of two groups, differences were removed. In other words, the mean of independent variables in the two groups wasn't significantly different. Also, results indicated that participation in non-farm employment has a positive effect on household consumption expenditure as a measure of welfare. So that, based on the average treatment effect on the treated (ATET), annual consumption expenditure of the households were engaged in non-farm employment was 1420 thousand Rials more than consumption expenditure of households without these activities.
 
Conclusions
The result of examining the impact of participation in non-farm activities on household consumption expenditure showed that participation in these activities has a positive effect on household consumption expenditures. Therefore, in order to, non-farm activities have more sustainable income and less risk than farm income, it is suggested that non-farm activities be expanded by strengthening and expanding existing industrial parks.

Keywords

References

Abadie, A., and . Imbens, G. W. (2006) Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica, 74: 235–267.(in farsi)
Abadie, A., and Imbens, G. W. (2012) Matching on the estimated propensity score. Harvard University and National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/aabadie/pscore.pdf.
Adjognon, G.S., Tasie, S.L.L., Fuente, A. and Benfica, R .(2017) Rural non-farm employment and household welfare: Evidence from Malawi,  world bank Group, policy research working paper 8096.
Ali, M., and Peerlings, J. (2012) Farm households and nonfarm activities in Ethiopia: Does clustering influence entry and exit ? Agricultural Economics, 43, 253–266.
Becker, S.O and Ichino, A. (2002) Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal , 2(4):358-377.
Bryson, A., Dorsett, R. and  Purdon, S.(2002) The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of labour market policies. Working Paper No. 4, Department for Work and Pensions.
Caliendo, M. and Kopeinig, S .(2005) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn, Discussion Paper No. 1588, Germany.
Che Mat S. H., Abdul Jalilb, A. Z. and Harun. M .(2012) Does non-farm income improve the poverty and income inequality among agricultural household in rural Kedah?, International Conference On Applied Economics (ICOAE), Procedia Economics and Finance, 1: 269 – 275.
Davis, B.,  Giuseppe, D. S  and Zezza, A . (2014).  Income diversification patterns in rural Sub-Saharan Africa : Reassessing the evidence, FAO and World Bank Group. Worldbank.org.
Debalen A., Paternostro, S. and Pirre, G. (2004) The returns to participation in the non-farm sector in rural Ruwanda. World Bank, working paper.
Elston, J. A., Hofler, R. and Lee, J. (2011) Dividend policy and institutional ownership: Empirical evidence using a propensity score matching estimator. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 11: 89-102
Filsaraie, M. (2015) Introduction to Matching Statistical Analysis Based on Propensity Score Matching (PSM) in Financial, Economics and Accounting Research, Economic Journal, 5 and 6, 5-22.
Ghasempouri, H. (2012). Investigating the role of non-farm income on rural poverty reduction in Delfan County, Lorestan Province. M.S. thesis, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Razi University. (in persian)
Heckman, J., Ichimura, H. and Todd, P. (1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64: 605-654.
Hoang, T.X., Pham, C.S. and Ulubasoglu, M.A. (2014) Non-farm activity, household expenditure, and poverty reduction in rural Vietnam: 2002–2008, World Development , 64, 554–568.
Imai, K. and  Ratkovic,  M. (2014) Covariate balancing propensity score. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series ,B 76: 243–263.
Iran Statistics Center, Population and Housing Census Results  2011 and 2016. https://www.amar.org.ir
Jatav, M. and Sen, S. (2013) Drivers of non-farm employment in rural India: Evidence from the 2009-10 NSSO Round. Economic & Political Weekly, 48(26-27): 14-21.
Kung, J. K. S. and  Lee, Y. F .(2001) So what if there is income inequality? The distributive consequence of nonfarm employment in rural China. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50: 19-46.
 Lanjouw, P .( 2001) Non-farm employment and poverty in rural El Salvador. World Development, 29(3): 529-547.
Mirakzadeh, A. A., Khaledi, F., Rigi karami, Z., & Alahveisi, M. E. (2017). Analysis of effective factors and barriers to development of non-farm activities with emphasis on home businesses :(Case study of Qouri Qaleh village). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 48(3), 533-547. doi:10.22059/IJAEDR.2017.63993(in persian)
Owusu, V., Abdulai,  A. and Abdul-Rahman, S .(2011) Non-farm work and food security among farm households in Northern Ghana. Food Policy. 36(2):108–118.
Pal, D. P. and Biswas, M. D. ( 2011) Diversification of farm and non-farm sectors and structural transformation of rural economy, 19th International Input-Output Conference. https://www.iioa.org/conferences.
Pavithra, S. and Vatta, K. (2013) Role of non-farm sector in sustaining rural livelihoods in Punjab, Agricultural Economics Research Review, 26(2): 257-265.
Rahbari, M., Shafie Sabet, N., & Rezaie, Z. (2017). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Non-Agricultural Economy and its Impacts on the Sustainability of Rural Settlements. Journal of Geography and Regional Development, 1(28), 237-258. doi:10.22067/geography.v15i1.59424. (in persian)
Rashidpour, L .(2012) A study on the role of non-farm activities on rural sustainable development in west Azarbaijan Province of Iran. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(3): 475-481.
Reardon, T. (2001) Rural nonfarm employment and incomes in Latin America: Overview and policy implications, World Development, 29(3): 395-409.
Rosenbaum, P. and Rubin, D.(1985) Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score, The American Statistican, 39: 33-38.
Rosenbaum, P., Donald, R. and Rubin, B .(1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1): 41–55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.
Scharf, M.M. and  Rahut, D. B .(2014) Nonfarm Employment and rural welfare: Evidence from the Himalayas, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96 (4), 1-15.
Senadza, B. ( 2011)  Does non-farm income improve or worsen income inequality? Evidence from rural Ghana,  African Review of Economics and Finance, 2(2): 104-121.
Shehu, A. and Siddique, A. (2014) Non-farm enterprises and poverty reduction amongst households in rural Nigeria: A propensity score matching approach, IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 19( 4): 57-61.
Sianesi, B .(2004) An evaluation of the active labour market programs in Sweden. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1): 133–155.
Smith, J .(2000) A Critical Survey of Empirical Methods for Evaluating Active Labor Market Policies, Schweizerische Zeitschrift fr Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, 136(3), 1–22.
Timothy, A.T. (2011) Rural non-farm incomes and poverty reduction in Nigeria. AERC Research Paper 224, African Economic Research Consortium, Nairobi.
Tucker J. W .(2010) Selection bias and econometric remedies in accounting and finance research, Journal of Accounting Literature, 27: 31-57.
Wiggins, S. and HazelL, P. (2011) Access to rural non-farm employment and enterprise development. Background Paper for the IFAD Rural Poverty Report.
World Bank (2006), The rural investment climate: it differs and it matters. Report no. 36543-GLB.Washington, D.C.: Agriculture and Rural Department.
Zereyesus, Y.A., Embaye, W.T., Tsiboe, F. and Boadu, V.A .(2017) Implications of non-farm work to vulnerability to food poverty-recent evidence from northern Ghana, World Development, 91: 113–124.
Zhao, Z .(2000) Data issues of using matching methods to estimate treatment effects: An illustration with NSW data set, Working Paper, China Centre for Economic Research.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics