Market structure analysis of Iranian apple export market with Pricing to Market (PTM) Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Masters of Agricultural Economics, Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran,Iran

2 TARBIAT MODARES UNIVERSITY / FACULTY MEMBER

3 tarbiat modares university faculty member

Abstract

Apple is considered one of the most important Iranian products, which has a high position in both job and value creation. In this study, empirical analysis of major Iranian apple export markets was conducted using the pricing to market (PTM) under two kind of exchange rate such as nominal exchange rate and real exchange rate. In this regard, the annual data from 1993 to 2015 were used. The econometric analysis using the panel corrected standard errors (PCSE) showed that PTM behavior is influenced by the exchange rate effects and The impact of country specific effects on the behavior of Apple exporters is not observed. The PTM behavior was better predicted with the real exchange rate. The analysis of the asymmetric effects of the exchange rate also showed that these effects are asymmetric in exports to the Netherlands. Given the negative sign of the coefficient of estimating the asymmetric effects model, it can be concluded that the effect of the depreciation of the rial on the transfer of exchange rate fluctuations to the Dutch apples markets is greater than its increase. Therefore, it is suggested that economic experts identify different market elasticity marks, to determine the type of market. In countries where the market is a competitive and elastic product, it is necessary to identify the behavior of other competitors and reduce export prices to compete with other countries where export Apple.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Amirnejad, H. Mazraeh, F., Navidi, H. (2015). The investigation of affecting factors on Iran’s medicinal plants export (Case study: Cumin). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 46(1), 75-81. (In Farsi).
Byrne, J.P., Chavali, A.S., Kontonikas, A. (2010) Exchange rate pass through to import prices: Panel evidence from emerging market economies. Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow. 19: 1–31.
Byrne, J.P., Kortava, E., MacDonald, R. (2013) A new approach to tests of pricing-to-market. J. Int. Money Finan. 32: 654–667.
Carew, R. (2000) Pricing to market behavior: Evidence from selected Canadian and U.S. agri food exports. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 25: 578–595.
Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran. (2016). < www.cbi.ir> (In Farsi).
Falk,M., Falk, R. (2000) Pricing tomarket of German exporters: Evidence from panel data. Empirica. 27: 21–46.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2017)
Islamic Republic of Iran Customs. (2017), < www.irica.gov.ir> (In Farsi).
Iran Trade Development Organization. (2016) (In Farsi).
Jin, H. J., Miljkovic, D. (2008) Competitive structure of US grain exporters in the world market: A dynamic panel approach. J. Int. Econ. Stud. 12: 33–63.
Kazeroni, A. Asgharpur, H And Farzi, N. (2016), Transition of exchange rate effect on the domestic price of the car market, with emphasis on the impact of import share from domestic market, Journal of Economic Research. 1(51), 205-228. (In Farsi).
Khoshnevis Yazdi, S., Rajabzadeh, R. (2016) The effect of real exchange rate changes on non-oil exports of Iran, Economic and Business Journal. 8(14): 43-59. (In Farsi)
Knetter, M.M. (1989) Price discrimination by US and German exporters. Am. Econ. Rev. 79: 198–210.
Knetter,M.M. (1993) International comparisons of pricing-to-market behavior. Am. Econ. Rev. 83: 473–486.
Krugman, P. (1987) Pricing to market when the exchange rate changes. In: Arndt, S.W. & Richardson, J.D. (Eds), Real Financial Linkages among Open Economies. MIT Press,Cambridge. 49–70.
Mallick, S., Marques, H. (2012) Pricing to market with trade liberalization: The role of market heterogeneity and product differentiation in India’s exports. J. Int. Money Finan. 31: 310–336.
Miljkovic, D., Brester, G. W., Marsh, J.M. (2003) Exchange rate pass-through, price discrimination, and US meat export prices. Appl. Econ. 35: 641–650.
Mortazavi, S.A., Mojtahedi, F. (2016). Exchange rates translation effect on export price of dates Iran: Application Model ARDL. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 46(4). 719-728. (In Farsi).
Pall, Z., Perekhozhuk, O., Teuber, R., Glauben, T. (2013) Are Russian wheat exporters able to price discriminate? Empirical evidence from the last decade. J. Agric. Econ. 64: 177–196.
Pesaran, M. H. (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CES ifo Working Paper Series No. 1229; IZA Discussion Paper No.1240.
Pesaran, M.H. (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. J. Appl. Econ. 22: 265–312.
Piraee, KH., Tassan, M., Daneshniya, M. (2015) The Effect of Foreign Direct Investment, Real Exchange Rate, and Economic Liberalization on Non-oil Exports in Iran (Toda Yamamoto's Proportional Test), Quarterly Journal of Economic Research. 50(1): 75-98. (In Farsi).
Silvente, F.R. (2005) Price discrimination and market power in export markets: The case of the ceramic tile industry. J. Appl. Econ. 8: 347–370.
Tabaian, N., Ajili, A. & Rezaei moghaddam, K. (2010), Factors Affecting Adoption of Apple Crop Insurance among Apple Growers in Semirom City: Multiplicity Model. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 41(1). 379-391. (In Farsi).
The World bank. (2016) .
Varma, P., Issar, A. (2016) Pricing to market behaviour of India’s high value agri-food exporters: an empirical analysis of major destination markets. Agric. Econ. 47: 129-137.
Vergil, H. (2011) Does trade integration affect the asymmetric behavior of export prices? The case of manufacturing exports of Turkey. African J. Bus. Manage. 5: 9808–9813.
Wooldridge, J. (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, MIT Press, Business & Economics,752 pages.
Zare Mehrjerdi, M., Tohidi, A. (2013) Transitional Exchange Rate in Iranian Pistachio Export Markets: Panel Data Approach, Journal of Agricultural Economics Research. 18(5), 165-185. (In Farsi).