Measurement of eco-efficiency of wheat based on water footprint

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Agricultural economics, Faculty of agriculture, Shiraz university

2 Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Economic Ecological Efficiency is defined as the efficiency of using environmental resources to meet human needs. This concept can be considered as a suitable criterion for evaluating the sustainability of production and its economic efficiency. Due to the fact that the production of agricultural products is associated with environmental effects and the highest amount of water consumption is used to produce agricultural products on a global scale, so in this study, in order to investigate the environmental effects of wheat production, water index was used. For this purpose, first the traces of wheat water in the provinces of the country during the period 2000-2011 were calculated and then the economic-ecological efficiency of wheat production was estimated. The results of water footprint calculation showed that the provinces of Gilan, South Khorasan, Semnan and Sistan and Baluchestan have the average total of more water footprint in wheat production. Also, the average water, green and gray water footprint in the country during the study period was equal to 2625.7, 428.1 and 594.1 cubic meters per ton. The results of estimating the economic-environmental efficiency also showed that among the studied variables, compositional input and green water footprint have the most positive effect on improving the production value of wheat. The results also show that the provinces of East Azerbaijan, North Khorasan and Khorasan Razavi have the lowest average efficiency and the provinces of Gilan, Sistan and Baluchestan, Mazandaran and Ilam have the highest economic-ecological efficiency of wheat production, respectively. The average total economic-ecological efficiency of wheat production was estimated to be 0.84. Also, the results of estimating the inefficiency model showed that the economic-ecological efficiency of crop production is higher for areas with per capita GDP and higher rainfall

Keywords


Ababaei, B., and Etedali, H. R. (2014). Estimation of water footprint components of Iran’s wheat production: Comparison of global and national scale estimates. Environmental Processes, 1(3): 193-205.
Agustina, S. (2016). The influence of technical inefficiency level that involve farmer’s behaviour on risk towards profit in rice production of Indonesia. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences58(10). ‏
Aigner, D., Lovell, C. K., and Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1): 21-37.
Battese, G. E., and Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20(2): 325-332.
Bonfiglio, A., Arzeni, A., and Bodini, A. (2017). Assessing eco-efficiency of arable farms in rural areas. Agricultural Systems, 151, 114-125.
Chapagain, A. K., Hoekstra, A. Y., and Savenije, H. H. (2006). Water saving through international trade of agricultural products. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10(3): 455-468. ‏
Dashti, Q., Mohammadpour, Z and Ghahramanzadeh, M. (2020). Evaluating the relationship between economic efficiency and environmental efficiency in Iran's agricultural sector. Agricultural Knowledge and Sustainable Production, 30 (4): 199-211. (In Farsi)
Döll, P., and Siebert, S. (2002). Global modeling of irrigation water requirements. Water resources research, 38(4): 8-1.
Emami Meybodi, A., Karimian, Z. And Rahmani Sefati, M. (2011). Measuring technical efficiency and productivity of Iranian petrochemical complexes (2001-2007). Journal of Energy Economics Studies, 29, 61-81. (In Farsi)
Fankhauser S., and Tol R.S. 2005. On climate change and economic growth. Resource and Energy Economics 27(1): 1-17.
Fathi, F., Sheikhzeinoddin, A., and Talebnejad, R. (2020). Environmental and economic risk management of seed maize production in Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120772.
Forleo, M. B., Palmieri, N., Suardi, A., Coaloa, D., and Pari, L. (2018). The eco-efficiency of rapeseed and sunflower cultivation in Italy. Joining environmental and economic assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3138-3153.
Ho, T. Q., Hoang, V. N., Wilson, C., and Nguyen, T. T. (2018). Eco-efficiency analysis of sustainability-certified coffee production in Vietnam. Journal of cleaner production, 183, 251-260.
Hoekstra, A. Y., and Mekonnen, M. M. (2012). The water footprint of humanity. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 109(9): 3232-3237.
Hoekstra, A.Y. and Chapagain, A.K. (2007). Water footprints of nations: water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. Water Resources Management, 21(1): 35–48.
 Hoekstra, A.Y. and Chapagain, A.K. (2008). Globalization of water: Sharing the planet’s freshwater resources. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
Jaramillo, F., and Destouni, G. (2015). Local flow regulation and irrigation raise global human water consumption and footprint. Science, 350(6265): 1248-1251. ‏
Kikha, A., Khanlari, A., Kikha, A. And Saboohi, M. (2020). The effect of climate change on land use and agricultural performance of Mazandaran province. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22 (10): 93-104. (In Farsi)
Li, N., Xiao, X., Cao, G., and He, B. (2017). Agricultural eco-environment efficiency and shadow price measurement in Three Gorges Reservoir area under non-point source pollution constraints. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering33(11): 203-210. ‏
Lovarelli, D., Bacenetti, J., and Fiala, M. (2016). Water Footprint of crop productions: A review. Science of the Total Environment548, 236-251. ‏
Mehregan, F. And Sidboyer, s. (2020). Investigating the Cost Effect of Environmental Pollution on Efficiency (Case Study: Economic Zones of China). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22 (8): 363-376. (In Farsi)
Mekonnen, M. M., and Hoekstra, A. Y. (2010). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crops products. ‏ Hydrolgical Earth System Science, 15, 1577–1600.
Mekonnen, M. M., and Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011). The green, blue and grey water footprint of farm animals and animal products. (Value of Water Research Report Series; No. 48). Delft: Unesco-IHE Institute for Water Education.
Mojavarian, M., Ahmadi Keliji, S. And Amin-Ravan, M. (2016). Application of Ricardin method in studying the effect of climate change on agricultural land rents, 481,1-491. (In Farsi)
Molaei, M. and Molaei, F. (2015). Estimation of environmental efficiency of agriculture, agricultural knowledge and sustainable production, 25 (2): 91-101. (In Farsi)
Molaei, M., and Sani, F. (2015). Estimation of technical efficiency and environmental efficiency of Sarab dairy farms (data envelopment analysis approach). Animal Sciences Research, Scientific Research Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, 25 (4), 141-155. (In Farsi)
Molaei, M., Hesari, N. Javan-Bakht, A. (2017). Estimating the environmental efficiency of input-oriented agricultural products (Case study: Environmental efficiency of rice production). Agricultural Economics (Economics and Agriculture), 11 (2), 157-172. (In Farsi)
Nowruzian, M., Esfandiari, M., Hosseini, M. And Musapur, Sh. (2019). Investigation of environmental efficiency of cotton growers in the country. Journal of Natural Environment, 72 (3): 389-402. (In Farsi)
Omrani, M. and Farajzadeh, Z. (2015). The role of capital types in the growth of Iran's agricultural sector. Agricultural Economics Research, 1 (7): 20-28. (In Farsi)
Rasooli Majd, N., Montaseri, M., Bahmanesh, J., and Rezaei, H. (2015). Identification and evaluation of the water footprint index, broken down by water, green water and gray water, by applying climate change. Master's Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University (In Farsi).
Robaina-Alves, M., Moutinho, V., and Macedo, P. (2015). A new frontier approach to model the eco-efficiency in European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production103, 562-573. ‏
Schaltegger, S., and Sturm, A. (1990). Ökologische rationalität: ansatzpunkte zur ausgestaltung von ökologieorientierten managementinstrumenten. Die Unternehmung, 273-290. ‏
Song, J., and Chen, X. (2019). Eco-efficiency of grain production in China based on water footprints: A stochastic frontier approach. Journal of Cleaner Production236, 117685. ‏
Statistical Center of Iran. (2020). Retrieved from https://nnt.sci.org.ir/sites/Apps/yearbook/Lists/year_book_req/Item/newifs.aspx.
Thanawong, K., Perret, S. R., and Basset-Mens, C. (2014). Eco-efficiency of paddy rice production in Northeastern Thailand: a comparison of rain-fed and irrigated cropping systems. Journal of Cleaner Production73, 204-217. ‏
Tsigaris, P., and Wood, J. (2019). The potential impacts of climate change on capital in the 21st century. Ecological economics162, 74-86. ‏
Wu, J., and Wu, T. (2012). Sustainability indicators and indices: an overview. Handbook of sustainability management, 65-86.
Yadollahi, A. (2020). Analysis of grain technology in Iran. Third International Conference on Interdisciplinary Studies in Food Industry and Nutrition Sciences, Iran, Tehran (1399). (In Farsi)
Zhang, C., and Anadon, L. D. (2014). A multi-regional input–output analysis of domestic virtual water trade and provincial water footprint in China. Ecological Economics100, 159-172. ‏
Zhang, J., Terrones, M., Park, C. R., Mukherjee, R., Monthioux, M., Koratkar, N., and Chen, Y. (2016). Carbon science in 2016: Status, challenges and perspectives. Carbon98(70): 708-732. ‏