Agricultural Economics

Agricultural Economics

Environmental Efficiency and Determinants of Economic Loss of Canola Production in of Tabriz County

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Department of Agricultural Economics University of Tabriz
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz
10.22034/iaes.2025.2055257.2115
Abstract
Accordingly, the present study aims to measure environmental efficiency and analyze the factors influencing the economic loss of canola production in rural areas of Tabriz County.
Materials and Methods: For this purpose, the required data and information were collected through a survey of 150 canola farmers in Tabriz County during the 2022–2023 cropping season. In this study, the environmental efficiency of farms was determined by estimating the stochastic frontier translog production function. Subsequently, the economic loss associated with the use of environmentally detrimental inputs, such as pesticides and chemical fertilizers, was calculated.
Results and discussion: The results of the estimated stochastic frontier translog function indicated that production factors, including seed, labor, water, pesticides and fertilizers, significantly influenced canola output. The average environmental efficiency of canola farms was estimated at 58.12%, suggesting considerable potential for reducing fertilizer and pesticide use and improving environmental efficiency in the region. Based on the results, 63.49% of farms exhibited efficiency levels above 80%, indicating that a significant proportion of farms efficiently and optimally utilized production inputs. Furthermore, the findings revealed that inefficient onion production per hectare resulted in an economic loss of 131,992 thousand rials for the region. According to the results, factors such as age, cultivation, the number of land plots and education significantly affected economic loss.
Suggestion: Therefore, it is essential to expand specialized training programs for farmers on optimizing input use, particularly chemical fertilizers and pesticides, with a focus on sustainable agricultural principles and resource efficiency. Additionally, the promotion and adoption of modern agricultural technologies should be prioritized as a strategy for enhancing environmental efficiency and mitigating negative impacts. In this regard, the development of support programs, such as insurance facilities and the strengthening of technical and managerial infrastructure, can play a crucial role in improving production sustainability and reducing economic losses in the agricultural sector of rural areas.
Keywords

Subjects


Aigner, D., Knox Lovel, C.A. and Schmidt, P. (1997). Formulation and estimation of   stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics. 6(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
Baghban Adami, R. (2023). Assessment of productivity and energy efficiency in canola production in Tabriz county. MSc Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz. (In Farsi)
Dashti, G., Ghasemi, E. and Ghahremanzadeh, M. (2024). Environmental efficiency and economic losses of onion production in Tabriz plain. Environmental Sciences. doi:10.48308/envs.2024.1440. (In Farsi)
Dashti, G., Ghasemi, E. and Ghahremanzadeh, M. (2025). Effective factors on the environmental efficiency of potato production in Ardabil county. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. doi: 10.22034/saps.2024.58668.3124
Ghasemi, E., Dashti, G. and Vahedi, J. (2023). Technical efficiency, environmental efficiency and economic losses of rainfed wheat production in Ahar county.  Agricultural Economics, 17(1):1-20.     doi: 10.22034/iaes.2022.1971035.1954. (In Farsi)
Khairalipour, K., Jafari Samrin, H. and Soleimani, M. (2017). Determining environmental impacts in rapeseed production using life cycle assessment method, case study: Ardabil province. Iranian Biosystems Engineering48 (4): 517-526. doi: 10.22059/ijbse.2017.218793.664864. (In Farsi)
Lozano, S., Gutiérrez, E. and Aguilera, E. (2024). Environmental efficiency of rainfed and irrigated wheat crops in Spain. A stochastic DEA metafrontier approach. OR Spectrum, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-024-00791-x
Masumkhani, F., Abolhasani, L., Khorramdel, S. and Mohadess., S. A. (2019). Evaluation of environmental impacts of major agricultural products of belherat rural district of Neyshabour using life cycle assessment. Journal of Agroecology11(3): 909-924. doi: 10.22067/jag.v11i3.72459. (In Farsi)
Ministry of Agriculture Jihad. (2023).  www.maj.ir
Moe, M. M., Bunyasiri, I. and Sirisupluxna, P. (2024). Environmental efficiency of monsoon rice (oryza sativa) production between transplanting and broadcasting sowing methods in Myanmar. The Open Agriculture Journal18(1): 1-10. doi: 10.2174/0118743315293141240424062821
Molaei, M.(2022). Estimating environmental efficiency and economic losses of sugar beet production in Urmia lake basin (central and Nazlu chay districts). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 32(3):319-331. (In Farsi)
Nikan, S., Dashti, G., Hosseinzad, J. and Ghahremanzadeh, M. (2024). Decomposition of factor productivity growth of rice in Iran: Application of stochastic frontier analysis approaches. Journal of Agricultural Economics & Development, 38(2), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.22067/jead.2024.86613.1251
Norouzi Avargani, R., Zarei, Mahmoudabadi. M. and Mahmoudyan, H. (2023). A systematic review of energy and environmental efficiency studies. Quarterly Journal of Energy Policy and Planning Research, 9(3): 171-203.
doi: 
http://epprjournal.ir/article-1-1141-fa.html. (In Farsi)
Norozian, M., Hoseini, S. M., Akbarei, A. and Dadrasmoghadam, A. (2022). Effective factors on environmental efficiency rapeseed cultivation in provinces of Iran (Approach spatial econometric). Agricultural Economics Research13(4): 60-77. doi: 10.30495/jae.2021.21934.2043. (In Farsi)
Raihan, A., Tanchangya, T., Rahman, J. and Ridwan, M. (2024). The influence of agriculture, renewable energy, international trade, and economic growth on India’s environmental sustainability. Journal of Environmental and Energy Economics3(1): 37-53. https://doi.org/10.56946/jeee.v3i1.324
Rasheed, N., Khan, D. and Magda, R. (2022). The influence of institutional quality on environmental efficiency of energy consumption in BRICS countries. Frontiers in Energy Research10, 943771. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.943771. (In Farsi)
Reinhard, S., Lovell, C.K. and Thijssen, G.J. (2000). Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables; Estimated with SFA and DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 121(2): 287-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00218-0
Tadayonpour, N., Sabzghabaei, G. R. and Dashti, S. S. (2021). Investigation of environmental effects of cabbage production in Dezful county using life cycle assessment. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production31(4): 341-354. doi: 10.22034/saps.2021.43191.2585. (In Farsi)
Tanursaz, A., Bakhshoodeh, M. and Azarm, H. (2021). The effects of conservation tillage on technical efficiency of wheat growers in Dezful county. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 31(1):331-348.  doi: 10.22034/saps.2021.12819 (In Farsi)
Tu, V.H., Can, N.D., Takahashi, Y., Kopp, S.W. and Yabe, M. (2019). Technical and environmental efficiency of eco-friendly rice production in the upstream region of the Vietnamese Mekong delta. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21: 2401-2424. doi: 10.1007/s10668-018-0140-0
Tu, V.H. (2017). Resource use efficiency and economic losses: Implications for sustainable rice production in Vietnam. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19: 285-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9724-0